UWIN survey
1.
Optional:
Name:
Email:
Affiliation:
2.
UWIN Version:
4.0b
3.2
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.2.5
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0b2
2.0b1
1.76
1.6
1.51
1.5
1.4
1.35
1.33
3.
What OS did you install on?
Check all that apply.
Windows XP
Windows ME
Windows 2000
Windows NT 4.*
Windows NT 3.*
Windows 98
Windows 95
Other:
4.
Primary purpose for installing UWIN?
research
home use
commercial use Other:
5.
How well do you know Windows XP/NT/2000 and/or Windows ME/98/95?
very well
somewhat well
somewhat
a little
not at all
6.
How well do you know UNIX and/or UNIX-like systems?
very well
somewhat well
somewhat
a little
not at all
7.
Were you able to install UWIN successfully?
yes
no
8.
What drive did you choose?
NTFS
FAT Other:
9.
How difficult was the installation?
very easy
somewhat easy
hard
very hard
10.
Did you install the UWIN development package -
uwin-dev
?
yes
no
If
yes
, how difficult was the installation?
very easy
somewhat easy
hard
very hard
11.
Please describe any problems encountered during installation:
12.
How would you rate each of the following:
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very Poor
Performance
Correctness
Completeness
Reliability
13.
If you have used another product to run UNIX utilities on Windows XP/2000/NT and/or Windows ME/98/95,
fill in the rows of the table that apply as follows:
Product
performance
correctness
completeness
reliability
MKS Toolkit
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
nutcracker
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
portage
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
cygwin
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
Interix
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
other
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
UWIN is
much better
somewhat better
about equal
somewhat worse
much worse
14.
Did any of the utilities that come with UWIN behave incorrectly? Please list which ones and how they misbehaved.
15.
Please list utilities that are not in UWIN that you think should be added.
16.
If you built or attempted to build software under UWIN answer the following:
Where you able to run the compiler?
yes
no
Did you use make or the nmake that comes with UWIN?
yes
no
List include files that were missing.
List symbols from include files that were missing.
List library functions that were missing.
Did your application run successfully?
yes
no
Thank you for taking the time to fill-out this survey.
Please forward questions or comments to
uwin@research.att.com
.
Survey Version 2004-12-25